| |
Topics Managing the development // 04.12.2022 The global state // 30.11.2022 History and opportunity windows. // 30.11.2022 State tendencies. // 30.11.2022 The system of the modern state // 30.11.2022 On the Jewish question // 30.11.2022 Thoughts on the Future 1: A World Not on Earth // 30.11.2022 European engagement // 30.11.2022 The economic games of the state // 30.11.2022 Private states // 30.11.2022 Century 21: Economic Slavery // 30.11.2022 Blockchain - Distributed Transactions as a Change of System // 30.11.2022 About Intellectual and Technological Dominance // 30.11.2022 Charlemagne or Charles the Great // a member of the Carolingian dynasty, was King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and the first Emperor of the Romans from 800. The Arab League // a regional organization in the Arab world, which is located in Northern Africa, Western Africa, Eastern Africa, and Western Asia. | // 30.11.2022 In the current situation of the ongoing pandemic, the question of balancing personal rights, liberty, and public safety remains as relevant as ever. The correlation between the individual and the public good continues to be a matter of debate. The danger of violating this balance seems very real, since the champions of so-called "public safety" are willing to enslave not only themselves, but also those who oppose such actions to the state. And the question is not that anyone is against ensuring the conditions of social security in all the usual senses of the concept. The point is that the state is always tempted to use the transfer by citizens of some of their rights to ensure public safety, for their own and not always noble purposes. Populism of "simple solutions", of coercion, of segregation on the basis of the presence or absence of risk of danger, always seems to be the most rational solution for the frenzied majority. Meanwhile, it is obvious that simple solutions to balancing individual rights and the public good have never been and never will be. And it seems perfectly real that the risk of government abuse is no less (or even obviously more) dangerous than almost any arbitrary danger. The rationale for this is that any dangers threatening humanity are objectively existing phenomena, often independent of human will (natural and sometimes man-made disasters, epidemics and pandemics). These dangers do not have their own desires and aspirations and do not seek to enslave people, and are in fact evolutionary challenges facing humanity as a whole. The state as an institution is an entirely different in nature. And very often this institution is afflicted and bruised by the most common human vices and base aspirations, which, being unconstrained by other social and social institutions, cause the state to violate and appropriate all human and civil rights and freedoms. This is why the violation of the balance by the state will invariably provoke a response of resistance from the dissenting part of society. comments powered by DisqusFree place |
Private analytical project | Author | Terms of Use | Site map | En version | Ru version |